|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ACHIEVEMENTS
MADE UNDER NATIONAL
LEPROSY ERADICATION |
|
| PROGRAMME SINCE 1982-83 IN HIMACHAL PRADESH |
|
|
( UPDATED UPTO
31-03-2008) |
|
|
|
LEPROSY CONTROL PROGRAMME |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| YEAR |
NEW CASES DETECTED |
CASES DELETED |
|
|
|
| |
Target |
Ach. |
%Age Ach. |
Target |
Ach. |
%Age Ach. |
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| 1982-83 |
3000 |
401 |
13.37 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
| 1983-84 |
500 |
319 |
63.80 |
200 |
307 |
153.50 |
|
|
| 1984-85 |
500 |
291 |
58.20 |
200 |
250 |
125.00 |
|
|
| 1985-86 |
500 |
308 |
61.60 |
300 |
208 |
69.33 |
|
|
| 1986-87 |
300 |
279 |
93.00 |
300 |
357 |
119.00 |
|
|
| 1987-88 |
300 |
239 |
79.67 |
300 |
378 |
126.00 |
|
|
| 1988-89 |
200 |
220 |
110.00 |
200 |
362 |
181.00 |
|
|
| 1989-90 |
200 |
196 |
98.00 |
200 |
384 |
192.00 |
|
|
| 1990-91 |
200 |
186 |
93.00 |
200 |
517 |
258.50 |
|
|
| 1991-92 |
250 |
151 |
60.40 |
250 |
221 |
88.40 |
|
|
| 1992-93 |
250 |
210 |
84.00 |
250 |
388 |
155.20 |
|
|
| 1993-94 |
200 |
227 |
113.50 |
200 |
792 |
396.00 |
|
|
| 1994-95 |
200 |
163 |
81.50 |
300 |
278 |
92.67 |
|
|
| 1995-96 |
200 |
167 |
83.50 |
300 |
578 |
192.67 |
|
|
| 1996-97 |
200 |
361 |
180.50 |
300 |
911 |
303.67 |
|
|
| 1997-98 |
300 |
335 |
111.67 |
600 |
1104 |
184.00 |
|
|
| 1998-99 |
400 |
371 |
92.75 |
1000 |
625 |
62.50 |
|
|
| 1999-00 |
200 |
409 |
204.50 |
1000 |
857 |
85.70 |
|
|
| 2000-01 |
50 |
335 |
670.00 |
500 |
279 |
55.80 |
|
|
| 2001-02 |
50 |
263 |
526.00 |
340 |
368 |
108.24 |
|
|
| 2002-03 |
100 |
280 |
280.00 |
400 |
258 |
64.50 |
|
|
| 2003-04 |
- |
308 |
- |
- |
289 |
- |
|
|
| 2004-05 |
- |
250 |
- |
- |
285 |
- |
|
|
| 2005-06 |
275 |
231 |
84.00 |
300.00 |
272 |
90.67 |
|
|
| 2006-07 |
- |
198 |
- |
- |
217 |
- |
|
|
| 2007-08 |
- |
246 |
- |
- |
236 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
( UPDATED UPTO
31-03-2008) |
|
|
For the Year 2007-08 |
|
|
| DISTRICT |
NEW CASES DETECTED |
ANCDR/ |
CASES DELETED |
|
CASES UNDER TREATMENT |
PR / |
CASES
UNDER TREATMENT |
|
| |
|
100000 |
|
10000 |
|
|
|
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
|
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
|
OPA |
IPA |
TOTAL |
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
9 |
1 |
10 |
2.62 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
9 |
- |
9 |
0.24 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
17 |
1 |
18 |
3.49 |
16 |
1 |
17 |
19 |
- |
19 |
0.37 |
2 |
17 |
19 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
3 |
- |
3 |
0.65 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
- |
3 |
0.06 |
- |
3 |
3 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
22 |
8 |
30 |
2 |
17 |
7 |
24 |
23 |
3 |
26 |
0.17 |
9 |
17 |
26 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
4 |
1 |
5 |
5.32 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
- |
3 |
0.32 |
3 |
- |
3 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
12 |
3 |
15 |
3.53 |
12 |
1 |
13 |
12 |
3 |
15 |
0.35 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
2 |
- |
2 |
5.38 |
- |
- |
0 |
2 |
- |
2 |
0.54 |
2 |
- |
2 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
15 |
2 |
17 |
1.68 |
14 |
- |
14 |
16 |
2 |
18 |
0.18 |
2 |
16 |
18 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
28 |
3 |
31 |
3.84 |
36 |
3 |
39 |
26 |
2 |
28 |
0.34 |
20 |
8 |
28 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
16 |
11 |
27 |
5.26 |
17 |
7 |
24 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
0.39 |
6 |
14 |
20 |
|
| 11.Solan |
49 |
27 |
76 |
13.6 |
46 |
30 |
76 |
43 |
12 |
55 |
0.98 |
49 |
6 |
55 |
|
| 12.Una |
8 |
4 |
12 |
2.39 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
7 |
- |
7 |
0.14 |
7 |
- |
7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
185 |
61 |
246 |
3.62 |
179 |
57 |
236 |
178 |
27 |
205 |
0.30 |
110 |
95 |
205 |
|
|
| |
District wise
Prevalence Rate Per 10000 Population |
|
|
|
Under NLEP in HP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
PR/10,000 |
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
0.3 |
0.14 |
0.23 |
0.29 |
0.17 |
0.28 |
0.08 |
0.24 |
0.21 |
0.24 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
1.3 |
0.59 |
0.41 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.39 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.26 |
0.22 |
0.14 |
0.16 |
0.18 |
0.13 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
0.7 |
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
0.23 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.23 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
4.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.48 |
0.63 |
0.86 |
1.00 |
0.55 |
0.43 |
0.32 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
1.7 |
0.65 |
0.72 |
0.76 |
0.92 |
0.51 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.31 |
0.35 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
0.3 |
0.32 |
0 |
0.3 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.28 |
0.00 |
0.54 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
0.7 |
0.16 |
0.27 |
0.24 |
0.29 |
0.31 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.18 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
1.2 |
0.41 |
0.51 |
0.54 |
0.58 |
0.54 |
0.67 |
0.39 |
0.41 |
0.34 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
4.5 |
0.79 |
1.7 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
0.41 |
0.32 |
0.32 |
0.39 |
|
| 11.Solan |
0.4 |
0.56 |
0.47 |
0.6 |
0.54 |
0.96 |
1.33 |
0.94 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
|
| 12.Una |
1.8 |
0.52 |
0.2 |
0.13 |
0.24 |
0.34 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
0.14 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| H.P. |
1.3 |
0.47 |
0.55 |
0.39 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
0.37 |
0.31 |
0.28 |
0.30 |
|
|
| |
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year 2006-07 |
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
NEW CASES DETECTED |
CASES DELETED |
|
| |
Target |
MB |
PB |
Total |
%age Ach. |
Target |
MB |
PB |
Total |
%age Ach. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
10 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
90.00 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
100.00 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
30 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
50.00 |
35 |
21 |
1 |
22 |
62.86 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
10 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
50.00 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
70.00 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
35 |
16 |
5 |
21 |
60.00 |
40 |
29 |
8 |
37 |
92.50 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
15 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
20.00 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
26.67 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
20 |
12 |
1 |
13 |
65.00 |
25 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
44.00 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
33.33 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
20 |
13 |
2 |
15 |
75.00 |
25 |
10 |
3 |
13 |
52.00 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
45 |
32 |
7 |
39 |
86.67 |
50 |
26 |
11 |
37 |
74.00 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
25 |
13 |
4 |
17 |
68.00 |
30 |
14 |
3 |
17 |
56.67 |
|
| 11.Solan |
45 |
35 |
17 |
52 |
115.56 |
45 |
25 |
23 |
48 |
106.67 |
|
| 12.Una |
15 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
60.00 |
12 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
83.33 |
|
| IGMC |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
275 |
153 |
45 |
198 |
72.00 |
300 |
156 |
61 |
217 |
72.33 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year 2005-06 |
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
NEW CASES DETECTED |
|
CASES DELETED |
|
|
|
| |
Target |
MB |
PB |
Total |
%age Ach. |
Target |
MB |
PB |
Total |
%age Ach. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
10 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
90.00 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
50.00 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
30 |
21 |
1 |
22 |
73.33 |
35 |
23 |
1 |
24 |
68.57 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
10 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
80.00 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
100.00 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
35 |
26 |
6 |
32 |
91.43 |
40 |
24 |
3 |
27 |
67.50 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
15 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
20.00 |
15 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
53.33 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
20 |
9 |
5 |
14 |
70.00 |
25 |
11 |
4 |
15 |
60.00 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
20.00 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
20 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
55.00 |
25 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
44.00 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
45 |
14 |
14 |
28 |
62.22 |
50 |
45 |
18 |
63 |
126.00 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
25 |
14 |
6 |
20 |
80.00 |
30 |
18 |
7 |
25 |
83.33 |
|
| 11.Solan |
45 |
31 |
26 |
57 |
126.67 |
45 |
35 |
44 |
79 |
175.56 |
|
| 12.Una |
15 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
26.67 |
12 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
41.67 |
|
| IGMC |
|
19 |
3 |
22 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| H.P. |
275 |
163 |
68 |
231 |
84.00 |
300 |
189 |
83 |
272 |
90.67 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW CASES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1999-00 |
|
|
2000-01 |
|
|
2001-02 |
|
|
2002-03 |
|
|
2003-04 |
|
|
2004-05 |
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
NEW CASES |
|
NEW CASES |
|
NEW CASES |
|
NEW CASES |
|
NEW CASES |
|
NEW CASES |
|
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
3 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
12 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
11 |
2 |
13 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
21 |
23 |
44 |
16 |
8 |
24 |
22 |
5 |
27 |
13 |
4 |
17 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
21 |
3 |
24 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
20 |
8 |
28 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
28 |
1 |
29 |
31 |
9 |
40 |
28 |
7 |
35 |
33 |
5 |
38 |
17 |
6 |
23 |
24 |
4 |
28 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
8 |
12 |
20 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
11 |
4 |
15 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
26 |
4 |
30 |
37 |
2 |
39 |
20 |
3 |
23 |
10 |
6 |
16 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
4 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
22 |
4 |
26 |
22 |
1 |
23 |
22 |
0 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
26 |
28 |
3 |
31 |
13 |
2 |
15 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
39 |
10 |
49 |
34 |
13 |
47 |
47 |
7 |
54 |
39 |
7 |
46 |
41 |
5 |
46 |
33 |
7 |
40 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
26 |
23 |
49 |
69 |
6 |
75 |
19 |
3 |
22 |
24 |
12 |
36 |
31 |
25 |
56 |
17 |
4 |
21 |
|
| 11.Solan |
30 |
29 |
59 |
17 |
14 |
31 |
21 |
16 |
37 |
28 |
17 |
45 |
50 |
25 |
75 |
29 |
42 |
71 |
|
| 12.Una |
17 |
13 |
30 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
13 |
1 |
14 |
11 |
2 |
13 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
|
| IGMC |
39 |
11 |
50 |
35 |
10 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
268 |
141 |
409 |
258 |
77 |
335 |
212 |
51 |
263 |
228 |
52 |
280 |
235 |
73 |
308 |
170 |
80 |
250 |
|
|
| |
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASES DELETED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1999-00 |
|
|
2000-01 |
|
|
2001-02 |
|
|
2002-03 |
|
|
2003-04 |
|
|
2004-05 |
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
DELETION |
|
DELETION |
|
DELETION |
|
DELETION |
|
|
DELETION |
|
DELETION |
|
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
6 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
41 |
33 |
74 |
21 |
11 |
32 |
22 |
3 |
25 |
12 |
4 |
16 |
13 |
3 |
16 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
25 |
9 |
34 |
16 |
1 |
17 |
9 |
2 |
11 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
55 |
26 |
81 |
36 |
7 |
43 |
31 |
7 |
38 |
27 |
7 |
34 |
31 |
5 |
36 |
18 |
4 |
22 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
40 |
12 |
52 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
49 |
4 |
53 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
23 |
5 |
28 |
28 |
3 |
31 |
36 |
3 |
39 |
20 |
6 |
26 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
68 |
4 |
72 |
12 |
1 |
13 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
21 |
0 |
21 |
26 |
2 |
28 |
31 |
2 |
33 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
91 |
21 |
112 |
34 |
6 |
40 |
40 |
12 |
52 |
34 |
7 |
41 |
47 |
2 |
49 |
28 |
1 |
29 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
151 |
62 |
213 |
29 |
4 |
33 |
57 |
9 |
66 |
30 |
4 |
34 |
27 |
13 |
40 |
29 |
24 |
53 |
|
| 11.Solan |
27 |
27 |
54 |
23 |
12 |
35 |
15 |
14 |
29 |
20 |
26 |
46 |
39 |
12 |
51 |
31 |
22 |
53 |
|
| 12.Una |
53 |
31 |
84 |
22 |
4 |
26 |
7 |
6 |
13 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
14 |
5 |
19 |
|
| IGMC |
9 |
6 |
15 |
6 |
8 |
14 |
59 |
7 |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
618 |
239 |
857 |
220 |
59 |
279 |
299 |
69 |
368 |
204 |
54 |
258 |
245 |
44 |
289 |
211 |
74 |
285 |
|
|
| |
|
STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF CASES UNDER
TREATMENT AT THE END OF THE YEAR |
|
|
|
| DISTRICT |
1999-00 |
|
|
2000-01 |
|
|
2001-02 |
|
|
2002-03 |
|
|
2003-04 |
|
|
2004-05 |
|
|
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
5 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
24 |
4 |
28 |
19 |
1 |
20 |
19 |
3 |
22 |
20 |
3 |
23 |
19 |
0 |
19 |
23 |
1 |
24 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
21 |
0 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
33 |
1 |
34 |
28 |
3 |
31 |
25 |
3 |
28 |
31 |
1 |
32 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
23 |
2 |
25 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
5 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
22 |
2 |
24 |
23 |
4 |
27 |
27 |
2 |
29 |
36 |
1 |
37 |
20 |
1 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
15 |
0 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
22 |
0 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
27 |
29 |
1 |
30 |
11 |
1 |
12 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
30 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
7 |
37 |
37 |
2 |
39 |
43 |
1 |
44 |
39 |
2 |
41 |
45 |
7 |
52 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
13 |
23 |
36 |
71 |
7 |
78 |
33 |
1 |
34 |
27 |
9 |
36 |
31 |
21 |
52 |
18 |
2 |
20 |
|
| 11.Solan |
18 |
8 |
26 |
12 |
10 |
22 |
18 |
12 |
30 |
26 |
3 |
29 |
37 |
16 |
53 |
35 |
36 |
71 |
|
| 12.Una |
22 |
1 |
23 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
14 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
|
| IGMC |
30 |
5 |
35 |
59 |
7 |
66 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
239 |
44 |
283 |
295 |
44 |
339 |
211 |
23 |
234 |
236 |
20 |
256 |
228 |
47 |
275 |
188 |
53 |
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRICT WISE STATUS OF
LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL PRADESH AS ON 31-3-2005 |
|
|
| DISTRICT |
2004-05 |
|
|
2004-05 |
|
|
2004-05 |
|
|
PR |
|
|
|
|
| |
NEW CASES |
|
DELETION |
|
Cases Under Treatment |
per |
Cases
Under Treatment |
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
10000 |
OPA |
IPA |
TOTAL |
|
| |
|
Pop. |
|
|
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
3 |
5 |
8 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0.08 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
21 |
3 |
24 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
23 |
1 |
24 |
0.48 |
3 |
21 |
24 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
6 |
1 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
0.18 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
24 |
4 |
28 |
18 |
4 |
22 |
23 |
2 |
25 |
0.17 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
10 |
1 |
11 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
1.00 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
10 |
6 |
16 |
20 |
6 |
26 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
0.27 |
3 |
8 |
11 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
13 |
2 |
15 |
31 |
2 |
33 |
11 |
1 |
12 |
0.12 |
0 |
12 |
12 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
33 |
7 |
40 |
28 |
1 |
29 |
45 |
7 |
52 |
0.67 |
27 |
25 |
52 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
17 |
4 |
21 |
29 |
24 |
53 |
18 |
2 |
20 |
0.41 |
3 |
17 |
20 |
|
| 11.Solan |
29 |
42 |
71 |
31 |
22 |
53 |
35 |
36 |
71 |
1.33 |
57 |
14 |
71 |
|
| 12.Una |
4 |
5 |
9 |
14 |
5 |
19 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
0.12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HP |
170 |
80 |
250 |
211 |
74 |
285 |
188 |
53 |
241 |
0.37 |
117 |
124 |
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
| DISTRICT
WISE STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL PRADESH AS ON 31-3-2004 |
|
|
| DISTRICT |
2003-04 |
|
|
2003-04 |
|
|
2003-04 |
|
|
PR |
|
| |
NEW CASES |
|
DELETION |
|
Cases Under Treatment |
per |
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
10000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Pop. |
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
11 |
2 |
13 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0.28 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
12 |
0 |
12 |
13 |
3 |
16 |
19 |
0 |
19 |
0.39 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
5 |
2 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
0.16 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
17 |
6 |
23 |
31 |
5 |
36 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
0.13 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
9 |
0 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
0.86 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
20 |
3 |
23 |
36 |
3 |
39 |
20 |
1 |
21 |
0.51 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
28 |
3 |
31 |
26 |
2 |
28 |
29 |
1 |
30 |
0.31 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
41 |
5 |
46 |
47 |
2 |
49 |
39 |
2 |
41 |
0.54 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
31 |
25 |
56 |
27 |
13 |
40 |
31 |
21 |
52 |
1.07 |
|
| 11.Solan |
50 |
25 |
75 |
39 |
12 |
51 |
37 |
16 |
53 |
0.96 |
|
| 12.Una |
11 |
2 |
13 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
14 |
2 |
16 |
0.34 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HP |
235 |
73 |
308 |
245 |
44 |
289 |
228 |
47 |
275 |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
| DISTRICT
WISE STATUS OF LEPROSY IN HIMACHAL PRADESH AS ON 31-3-2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR |
|
| DISTRICT |
NEW CASES |
|
DELETION |
|
Cases Under Treatment |
per |
|
| |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
MB |
PB |
TOTAL |
10000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pop. |
|
| 1.Bilaspur |
5 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
0.17 |
|
| 2.Chamba |
13 |
4 |
17 |
12 |
4 |
16 |
20 |
3 |
23 |
0.49 |
|
| 3.Hamirpur |
6 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
0.14 |
|
| 4.Kangra |
33 |
5 |
38 |
27 |
7 |
34 |
31 |
1 |
32 |
0.24 |
|
| 5.Kinnaur |
4 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
0.58 |
|
| 6.Kullu |
37 |
2 |
39 |
28 |
3 |
31 |
36 |
1 |
37 |
0.95 |
|
| 7.Lahul-Spiti |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
|
| 8.Mandi |
26 |
0 |
26 |
21 |
0 |
21 |
27 |
0 |
27 |
0.29 |
|
| 9.Shimla |
39 |
7 |
46 |
34 |
7 |
41 |
43 |
1 |
44 |
0.60 |
|
| 10.Sirmaur |
24 |
12 |
36 |
30 |
4 |
34 |
27 |
9 |
36 |
0.77 |
|
| 11.Solan |
28 |
17 |
45 |
20 |
26 |
46 |
26 |
3 |
29 |
0.56 |
|
| 12.Una |
13 |
1 |
14 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
0.24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H.P. |
228 |
52 |
280 |
204 |
54 |
258 |
236 |
20 |
256 |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|